About Me

Name: NYMike
Email: mstephens3186@verizon.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Right On!!
Thomas Sowell

This is truly getting ridiculous . . .

I hereby violate every dictum and realm of integrity of the blogosphere by posting the following, completely and totally ripped of from Toby Harndon of the London Telegraph - since I have given credit I ease my conscience. But this amateur statesmanship continuously demonstrated by Obama's staff is so Junior High - I do hope that someone brought a US Region 1 DVD player so Barack and Gordon can sit around and watch the DVDs our ever-so-thoughtful President dutifully gave to The Prime Minister of England upon his visit to The Colonies.  Oh, and I do pray the staffer with the 7th grade gifting skills remembered to bring a converter.  Now on to the most recent embarrasment:

So here's what the White House is telling American reporters - and by extension the American people - about Britain. It's laid out in an inch-thick "press kit", with the Seal of the President of the United States emblazoned on the cover, handed out to each of us on board the White House press charter en route from Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington to Stansted.

The United Kingdom, we are told, is "slightly smaller than Oregon". As for the the British climate, it is "generally mild and temperate" and "subject to frequent changes but few extremes of temperature". A "group of islands close to continental Europe", Britain has been "subject to many invasions and migrations".

We're taken through the Roman invasion ("brought more active contacts with the rest of Europe"), the Norman invasion (led to "active involvement in European affairs...for several hundred years") and various travails with the Welsh, Scots and Irish before the British empire reached its zenith in Victorian times.

Then it all started to go wrong. "The losses and destruction of World War I, the depression of the 1930s, and decades of relatively slow growth eroded the United Kingdom's preeminent international position of the previous century".

Those fretting about the demise of the term "special relationship" might not be reassured by this briefing book. There's talk of a "strong bilateral relationship", of the UK being "one of the United States' closest allies" and of "close coordination" and "bilateral cooperation" between two countries who "continually consult on foreign policy". Everything except "special".

After the country sections, we're introduced the personalities, with information mainly culled from their websites. Queen Elizabeth "enrolled as a girl Guide when she was eleven, and later became a Sea Ranger", we are informed. During the war she "put on pantomimes with the children of members of staff for the enjoyment of her family and employees of the Royal Household".

Gordon Brown's entry reads a little like one of those awful Christmas round robins. Young Gordon, we are told repeatedly, was very, very clever. He "did well a school from an early age" and then "excelled at sport and joined in every aspect of school life, quickly becoming popular".

He "took his exams a year ahead of his contemporaries" and "went on to University at the age of 15", where he edited the student newspaper "in a prize-winning year" and won "a First Class Honours degree and a number of prizes for his studies".

David Cameron seems to be auditioning for the role of British Barack in advance of his big meeting with the President tomorrow (in the Yellow Room at Winfield House), stating he was elected Conservative leader with a "mandate to change the party and change the country" and "believes there is urgent need for change".

Since her presidential bid, Hillary Clinton, now Secretary of State, has scaled down her claims of being "instrumental" in bringing peace to Northern Ireland. All we get on the Emerald Isle is a modest: "With Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary Clinton worked to launch the government's Vital Voices Democracy Initiative."

The former New York senator skips quickly over her defeat in the battle for the Democratic nomination. "In 2006, Senator Clinton won reelection to the Senate, and in 2007 she began her historic campaign for president," her biography reads. "In 2008, she campaigned for the election of Barack Obama and Joe Biden."

For those who might bristle at the "slightly smaller than Oregon" description of Britain (which seems to originate from the CIA World Factbook), US geographical comparisons are also included in the other country profiles prepared by the State Department's  Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.

Germany - a "reliable US ally" since 9/11 - is "about the size of Montana" while the Czech Republic "about the size of Virginia". 

We are informed that France is "America's oldest ally" and was "instrumental in helping Britain's American colonies establish independence" and more recently has been "a close partner with the US in the war on terror".

It is the largest country in Europe. But only "about four-fifths the size of Texas".

Oregon, by the way, has a population of 3.7 million while the population of the UK is more than 60 million.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This is a big one . . .

So many things to comment on over the last few weeks- but nothing so chilling as Rick Wagoner being fired by our Federal Government - a private citizen hired by a board of a public company to run their operations, not living up to some government standard enough to merit more bailout funds - he is the first big one to go, what industry and what private citizen is next?

One down, how many to go??

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is happening here . . . .

. . . is not entirely clear.  How long ago did this hard turn to the left begin?  At what point did the power of the people begin to be transferred from the people and morph into the ever growing and powerful government we have today?  The Obama presidency is but another step, a giant step, away from the vision the founders and the framers had for this country - but when was the first step taken, from what sprung the root of the root, that has emerged to pull this country so far from it's original intent?  It is fact that the original intent of the founding of the United States was nothing short of freedom from tyranny and in support of a people governed only by the consent of the governed.  The history is without interpretation - from the first shots at Concord to Washington escaping in the fog to the surrender at Yorktown - the power of this new republic would be from the people, by the people.  The founders were emphatic that we be a federation of states with a central government that derived its power from the states and their representatives.  The framers were intent in developing a document that would withstand time and took great pains as to phrases and words that would stand the test of man's innovation and progress for centuries to come.

Did it begin with Tammany Hall in the 1850s, a mere 76 years after the Declaration and just over 60 year or so after Constitution was adopted?  Was it so soon that the ideals of a representative republic built on the principle of self-determination began to erode that has brought us to where we are today, such that our representatives can call on the power of government to impel private citizens to relinquish their earnings to the government because the government deemed those earnings to be the property of government?  Did it only really take 6 decades for the seeds of righteous indignation of our elected representatives, and their contempt for us, the governed, to be sown into fields of divisiveness and identity politics that lords over the political process of today?

Or was it some faceless, nameless bureaucrat from a listless and lowly presidency of a Tyler, Filmore, or Arthur that headed some obscure, newly created agency that gave birth to the idea that power was more important than doing the people’s biding, that control of the federal purse was more important than the will of the people.  At some point, the tide shifted from the states granting powers to and funding the federal government, to today where the federal government grants powers to the states and provides major funding and holds leverage over the states for their very existence.  

For example, in reality there was no literal national speed limit of 55 mph enacted in the early 70s.  The Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act of 1973 was a mandate from the federal government to the states.  Any state that did not go along with the 55 mph speed limit would lose federal highway dollars to repair roads in that state,the federal government thereby exercised control and blackmail over the states in this one very narrow instance.  Multiply this one very real and damaging legislation over decades and decades and thousands of acts and of the growth and power of the federal government, counter to the founders’ and the framers’ intents – you have to ask yourself, when did it start?

And here we are today with the present administration of 40-somethings wielding more power than has ever been seen by a federal bureaucracy and inventing more money out of thin air than has ever been witnessed and can never be accounted for.  The assault on liberty and individuality and personal freedom has never been more in force than it is today.  What country are we living in when our legislators can demand that  a private individual remand over to the federal government his earnings at the threat of special legislation directed specifically at this said individual, totally contrary to the constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10)?  What  kind of Americans have we empowered that grant our protections and rights granted us under our Constitution to those illegally in this country?

At what point . . . . I am tiring of asking questions that have no prospect of being answered absent a new and radical response from what is left of the rational, educated, and achievment class of our society.  Sadly, too many of them voted for change with no understanding at all of what this hard turn to the left would do, and is doing.  I have said in previous posts that the Left and the Obamists of this great nation will be more than willing to govern a 3rd rate country, and that is exactly their goal and the path to which we are being led down -  we will be consumed by our own debt as an effective net sub-prime borrower on the world stage, we will be emasculated militarily on the world stage, and we will be relegated to 3rd world status by any measure if the Left and Obamunism succeeds - AND, it will be perfectly alright with them, as long as they remain in power.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thank you ever so much, Mr. President

"Americans know that our economic recovery will take years -- not months," he said. "But they will have little patience if we allow politics to get in the way of action, and our economy continues to slide."

There have been 31 recessions in the United States since 1854.  We are currently in the 32nd contraction of the economy, which started in January of 2008. The average recession has lasted 17 months.  The second longest contraction lasted 43 months from Aug 1929 to Mar 1933, thank you Mr. Roosevelt - the longest was in 1870s.  A little thing called the Civil War and Reconstruction were in play then, as well as new transportation networks that displaced the working populations in the east to new centers of industry in the west.  So thank you, Mr. Obama, for continuing to talk down the American economy. We are desperate now, as you told us during your Health Care Summit.  Did not GDP grow 1.9% in 2008 in spite of the rest of the world's economies sliding and world-wide demand for all goods and services pulling back?  If it history is guide, and it always is, we would be coming out of this recession this spring or early summer.  By this summer $3.00 gas will be back with the summer driving season and reformulation, the Dow will be hovering around 5000, unemployment will be 10%, and a third homeowner bailout will be on the table because the first two will have only prevented the renter-society from going back to renting sooner than later.  Some people are born to rent and do not have the fiscal discipline or enough basic understanding of personal economics to own a home.

Obama's policies are basically guaranteeing a long, slow, painful road to recovery.  Obama recently declared "disasterous" consequences ahead if congress fails to act now.  He is acting now, and failing miserably. His management-by-crisis methodology is failing. Every week that goes by that his socialist plans are not implemented is another week where, in towns across America, the street lights are still on, the water still runs, and hard-working, innovative, and industrious Americans are getting by in spite of your doomsday scenarios and your 75 degree Oval Office. 

The primary scheme at work is escaping the American people. There is method in his madness and that of the left.  What Obama
 offers, in concert with his cadre of Harry, Nancy, and Barney is a long, long period of mediocrity.  Liberals and left in this country will be perfectly content governing a 3rd rate country.  We will now take a back seat in aid to Africa and aids research, a backseat in medical research, a backseat in manufacturing, a backseat in food production  - and that is perfecly alright with them. After al, look at the third rate cities where the left and liberals are in power. How does it feel, Detroit, New Orleans, New York in the burroughs, San Francisco, Atlanta?  Things better for you?  Your leaders are certainly living large. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »